In the fast-paced world of cybersecurity, staying ahead of malicious actors is an ever-evolving challenge. One framework that has gained significant attention is the MITRE ATT&CK framework, often dubbed the “treasure map” for security professionals. In this article, we’ll unravel the mysteries of the MITRE ATT&CK Framework and explore its relevance in the world of cyber threats.

As the leaves change color and fall descends upon us, we are excited to dive into the fascinating realm of cybersecurity. This month, our spotlight is on the MITRE ATT&CK framework and ensuring that you have reliable, accurate data and analysis.

Defining the MITRE ATT&CK Framework

Before we delve into the depths of this framework, let’s start by demystifying it. Imagine you are a curious cat, and the MITRE ATT&CK Framework is like a big map of all the sneaky tricks that mischievous mice can use to get away from you. It’s a special guide for humans who want to understand how computer bad guys, known as hackers, try to sneak into computer systems and cause trouble.

In more serious terms, it’s like having a playbook of tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) that cyber adversaries employ. It’s a comprehensive knowledge base that sheds light on the strategies hackers use to infiltrate systems and wreak havoc. This knowledge is invaluable for security professionals, helping them defend against these cunning adversaries.

Why Should Security Professionals Care?

Now that we have a sense of what the MITRE ATT&CK framework is, let’s explore why security professionals should care about it. This framework serves various purposes, making it a valuable asset for anyone in the cybersecurity field:

  1. Comprehensive Understanding: The MITRE ATT&CK framework provides a holistic view of cyber threats, ensuring that security professionals are aware of a wide range of attack techniques.
  2. Real-World Relevance: It’s not just theoretical. The framework is based on real-world cyberattacks, making it highly relevant for practitioners.
  3. Threat Intelligence: It’s a goldmine of threat intelligence. By understanding how attacks work, security professionals can stay one step ahead of adversaries.
  4. Training and Education: For cybersecurity training, the MITRE ATT&CK framework offers a structured curriculum for understanding and countering threats.
  5. Communication: It provides a common language for security teams, making it easier to communicate and collaborate effectively.
  6. Risk Assessment: Security professionals can use the framework to assess the risks associated with different attack techniques.
  7.  Vendor Evaluation: When considering cybersecurity solutions, the framework can help organizations evaluate vendors and their offerings.

Continuing on we present a unique dialogue between AI and real-world human expertise. At the heart of this creative approach is the idea of ChatGPT, a powerful AI language model, initially providing its take on the topic at hand. While ChatGPT’s contributions are undoubtedly impressive, the true value emerges when our expert takes the stage. Our human expert dives deeper, offering a richer and more nuanced perspective on the subject. This dynamic duo of AI and human expertise showcases the synergy between advanced technology and the depth of human knowledge. It becomes evident that while AI can provide valuable insights, our expert’s answers are ultimately superior, drawing from extensive experience and a real-world understanding that ChatGPT, as advanced as it is, simply cannot replicate.

Question: What are the Most Common Attack Techniques?

ChatGPT: One question that often arises is, “What are the most common attack techniques according to the MITRE ATT&CK framework?” The most common answer was phishing (Technique 1566). However, it’s essential to note that this information might be slightly outdated.

Our Verdict: The frequency of attack techniques can vary depending on various factors. In our latest research, we’ve found that it depends on the sources and the specific focus of the analysis. For instance, in one study, phishing might top the list, while in another, a different technique could take the lead. (We explore this further in the IRIS Risk Retina Threat Event Analysis)

Question: What is the Impact of Attack Techniques?

ChatGPT: Beyond frequency, it’s crucial to consider the impact of attack techniques. Some techniques might be more prevalent but less damaging, while others could have a significant financial impact. To understand the latter, we need to explore which attack techniques contribute to the largest financial damages.

Our Verdict: One might assume that ransomware (Technique 1486), which involves encrypting data for exfiltration, would top the list. While it’s a plausible assumption, there are nuances to consider. In our IRIS TEA research, we found that the overwhelming majority of incidents involving substantial financial losses are related to attacks on valid account credentials (Technique 1071).

Question: What are Multiparty Cyber Incidents?

ChatGPT: Multi-party cyber incidents, also known as supply chain or third-party cyber incidents, refer to cybersecurity breaches or attacks that have a ripple effect across multiple organizations or entities. These incidents typically involve a primary target organization that is directly compromised by cybercriminals. However, the consequences of the attack extend beyond this initial victim to affect other organizations connected to it in some way. Multi-party cyber incidents can take various forms and often occur within interconnected business ecosystems

Our Verdict: I believe we can refine this definition for greater clarity. In our report, we define “breaches” as ripples when there are attacks on three or more firms, not just one or two. This includes the initial victim and at least two additional entities, and what’s crucial is the existence of a business-to-business relationship among them. This business relationship encompasses more than just traditional supply chain scenarios; it includes various forms of relationships such as legal, physical, and other tangible interactions that extend beyond the realm of typical cyber and data-related elements. Recognizing these diverse types of relationships becomes vital when assessing the impact of cyber events, as we’ve emphasized the importance of considering impacts that extend beyond purely technical aspects. Indeed, the fusion of technical and physical implications is evident, as we are currently witnessing at the MGM event, where technical issues are spilling over into tangible, real-world consequences.

Question: What are Common Initial Access Techniques in Multiparty Incidents

ChatGPT: Multi-party cyber incidents often involve the exploitation of various initial access techniques, as attackers seek to compromise multiple organizations in a supply chain or interconnected network. Common initial access techniques observed in multi-party cyber incidents include Phishing (T1566).

Our Verdict: With the multi-party incidents definition in mind, let’s delve into the common initial access techniques employed in these ripple events or multiparty incidents. How do these incidents typically start? Phishing emerges as one of the most prevalent techniques, and it’s indeed a noteworthy one.

Furthermore, we can draw insights from our upcoming research on ripples across various contexts. However, it’s essential to recognize that this analysis involves multiple dimensions, a nuance that can sometimes be challenging to convey in a chat interaction, where precise prompts play a crucial role.

When evaluating impact in terms of financial losses, we find that exploiting public-facing applications takes the lead. Therefore, the answer to the question about the most common technique depends on the specific context and the purpose behind the inquiry.

The Bottom Line

In the ongoing race between humans and machines in the field of cybersecurity research, it’s clear that practitioners are the ultimate beneficiaries. While we’ve experimented with AI models like ChatGPT to assist in our research, the results have been mixed. While promising, these models have not yet fully replaced human expertise when it comes to nuanced and complex tasks. In addition, the data was (sometimes) several years old, and while some of the information remains similar to the data analyzed this year by our experts, this is wholly unreliable for Professionals who need up-to-date, accurate, and specific analysis.

That said, we continue to explore new avenues and expand our sources of information to provide our readers and customers with the most up-to-date and accurate insights. The journey towards more effective and efficient cybersecurity research is ongoing.

If you’re interested in diving deeper into our research or discussing how we can assist you in your cybersecurity endeavors, please feel free to reach out to us. Your feedback and collaboration are always welcome as we collectively work to secure the digital world.

In the dynamic landscape of cybersecurity, there’s always more to discover, and we’re excited to continue this journey with you. If you want more ChatGPT shenanigans check out our YT channel!

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.